Integrity Challenges of Audio-Visual Journalism in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

Main Article Content

Abdul Syukur
Faisal Utama
Edison Bonar Tua Hutapea

Abstract

Maintaining integrity and professional morality amid the secondary disruption of the broadcasting media industry due to Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration has become crucial and vital. AI carries the risk of bias and hallucination, while regulations are not yet fully capable of anticipating this "AI tsunami." This research is highly important as a source of input and consideration for journalism stakeholders to protect the integrity of the newsroom, ensuring it remains sterile from the negative impacts of AI. The primary objective of this study is to analyze the multiplier effect of artificial intelligence (AI) on press integrity in Indonesia and to evaluate the effectiveness of existing domestic legal instruments. Beyond the framework of domestic law, this discussion also attempts to examine the Islamic perspective on the AI "tsunami," which can be misused to generate hoaxes and misinformation. The methodology employed is descriptive and qualitative through a normative-legal approach, using a critical paradigm as the analytical tool. The methodological analysis reveals an asymmetrical misalignment between the evolutionary speed of generative technology and the scope of formal normative law, which triggers regulatory gaps that are vulnerable to exploitation for capital accumulation. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of the legal deconstruction of Press Council Regulation (Peraturan Dewan Pers) Number 1 of 2025 with an analysis of viewers' visual cognitive impact, using Ulric Neisser’s Cognitivism Theory, Elihu Katz’s Uses and Gratifications Theory, David Manning White’s Gatekeeping Theory, and the concept of Tabayyun in Islamic theology. The implications of this research emphasize the urgent need for operational policy reform in newsrooms that positions human journalists as absolute ethical quality controllers to safeguard the public sphere from the threat of machine-manufactured audiovisual disinformation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Syukur, A., Utama, F., & Hutapea, E. B. T. (2026). Integrity Challenges of Audio-Visual Journalism in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Civilization Research: Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(2), 424–442. https://doi.org/10.61630/crjis.v5i2.183
Section
Article

References

Abdullah, M. S. (2005). Asbabun Nuzul: Latar belakang historis turunnya ayat-ayat Al-Qur'an. Pustaka Al-Kautsar.

Aliansi Jurnalis Independen. (2025). Asesmen penggunaan kecerdasan buatan (AI) dalam media di Indonesia: Tantangan, peluang, dan pengembangan standar etika. AJI Indonesia.

amsi.or.id. (2026). Jurnalis Indonesia dan AI: Antara produktivitas, peluang, dan tantangan etika. Asosiasi Media Siber Indonesia.

Baird, J. L. (1925). Sensation and television. Royal Institute Press.

Baksin, A. (2006). Jurnalistik televisi teori dan praktik. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Beckett, C. (2019). New powers, new responsibilities: A global survey of journalism and artificial intelligence. Polis, London School of Economics and Political Science.

Besman, A. (2026). Masa depan jurnalisme penyiaran di era kecerdasan buatan. Universitas Padjadjaran.

Besman, A., & Evita, S. (2024). AI in semi-automated journalism: A review of Indonesia’s journalistic ethic. Journal of Indonesian Media Studies, 12(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v8i3.7978

Briggs, A., & Burke, P. (2010). A social history of the media: From Gutenberg to the Internet. Polity Press.

Calvo Rubio, L. M., & Rojas Torrijos, J. L. (2024). Criteria for journalistic quality in the use of artificial intelligence. Communication & Society, 37(2), 247-259. doi: 10.15581/003.37.2.247-259

Dewan Pers. (2025). Peraturan Dewan Pers Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 tentang Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Karya Jurnalistik. Dewan Pers Indonesia.

Diakopoulos, N. (2019). Automated journalism: How algorithms are rewriting the news. Oxford University Press.

Hasyim, T., Kuswarno, E., & Wahyudin, U. (2026). Tren penelitian tantangan profesi jurnalis di era artificial intelligence: Analisis bibliometrik artikel terindeks Scopus tahun 2020–2025. Jurnal Komunikasi Profesional, 10(1), 45-60.

Heiseonline. (2026). ZDF: Report with AI video in “haute journal.” Heise Online Media.

Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2023). Digital disruption: AI and the transformation of industrial work. Journal of Media Sociology, 15(3), 112-128.

Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523.

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital. (2023). Klarifikasi hoaks: Video pidato Presiden Joko Widodo menggunakan bahasa Mandarin. Komdigi RI.

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital. (2025). Laporan sebaran konten disinformasi, fitnah, dan ujaran kebencian di platform digital. Komdigi RI.

Kitley, P. (2000). Television, nation, and culture in Indonesia. Ohio University Press.

Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1(2), 143-153.

Lewis, S. C., & Westlund, O. (2015). Actors, actants, audiences, and activities in the journalism domain. Digital Journalism, 3(1), 19-37.

Listiyonigsih et al. (2025). Exploration of Media Ethics in the AI Era: A Case Analysis of Radarsolo.com. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkj.v8i2.59388.

Majelis Ulama Indonesia. (2017). Fatwa Nomor 24 Tahun 2017 tentang Hukum dan Pedoman Bermuamalah Melalui Media Sosial. MUI.

Majelis Ulama Indonesia. (2025). Hoaks, serangan senyap yang menggerogoti bangsa dan sikap Islam. https://mui.or.id/baca/berita/hoaks-serangan-senyap-yang-menggerogoti-bangsa-dan-sikap-islam.

Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Eddy, K., & Nielsen, R. K. (2024). Reuters Institute digital news report 2024. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considerations for journalism education. Journal of Mass Communication Educator, 78(1), 84-93.

People’s Daily. (2023). Introduction of Ren Xiaorong: The AI news anchor. People Daily Online.

Republik Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 1999 tentang Pers. Sekretariat Negara.

Sen, K., & Hill, D. T. (2001). Media, culture and politics in Indonesia. Institut Studi Arus Informasi.

Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. P. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. Routledge.

Solihah, R., Millah, M., & Nuralisah, S. (2024). Hoaks di media sosial dalam perspektif hadis. Al-Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam, 2(4), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.59059/al-tarbiyah.v2i4.1437

White, D. M. (1950). The “gatekeeper”: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27(4), 383-390.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fuchs, C. (2021). Social media: A critical introduction (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Indonesian Broadcasting Commission. (2012). Broadcasting Code of Conduct and Standards for Broadcast Programs (P3SPS). KPI.

Indonesian Press Council. (2025). Press Council Regulation Number 1 of 2025 concerning Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Journalistic Works. Dewan Pers.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mosco, V. (2019). The political economy of communication (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.